Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
    Cash And Trade MagazineCash And Trade Magazine
    Button
    • Cash
    • Trade
    • Islamic Finance
    • Interview
    • Issues
      • 2010
        • Issue 00 Launch Issue
        • Issue 01 January / February 2010
        • issue 02 March / April 2010
        • Issue 03 May / June 2010
        • Issue 04 July / August 2010
        • Issue 05 September / October 2010
        • Issue 06 November / December 2010
      • 2011
        • Issue 07 January / February 2011
        • Issue 08 March / April 2011
        • Issue 09 May / June 2011
        • Issue 10 July / August 2011
        • Issue 11 September / October 2011
        • Issue 12 November / December 2011
      • 2012
        • Issue 13 January / February 2012
        • Issue 14 March / April 2012
        • Issue 15 May / June 2012
        • Issue 16 July / August 2012
        • Issue 17 September / October 2012
        • Issue 18 November / December 2012
      • 2013
        • Issue 19 January / February 2013
        • Issue 20 March / April 2013
        • Issue 21 May / June 2013
        • Issue 22 July / August 2013
        • Issue 23 September / October 2013
        • Issue 24 November / December 2013
      • 2014
        • Issue 25 January / February 2014
        • Issue 26 March / April 2014
        • Issue 27 May / June 2014
        • Issue 28 July / August 2014
        • Issue 29 September / October 2014
        • Issue 30 November / December 2014
      • 2015
        • Issue 31 January / February 2015
        • Issue 32 March / April 2015
        • Issue 33 May / June 2015
        • Issue 34 July / August 2015
        • Issue 35 September / October 2015
    • News Round
    • Press Releases
    • Tajara Monitor
    • Training
    Cash And Trade MagazineCash And Trade Magazine
    Home»Cash»Unique ‘cash margin’ structure turns deal
    Cash

    Unique ‘cash margin’ structure turns deal

    March 2, 2014Updated:March 2, 2014No Comments6 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Telegram Pinterest Tumblr Reddit WhatsApp Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
    12
    Jindal Saw plant in India

    The Indian steel and manufacturing company Jindal Saw received an order worth $168m from Iraq, with another potential order of $150m provided the quality of goods supplied under the first contract was of an acceptable standard.

    However, Jindal Saw’s senior management was not keen to supply material to Iraq without assurance on the payment, due to limited control after supplying the material and the volatile nature of the country

    The big trade finance challenge for the corporate treasury, therefore, was to cover the sovereign risk in an acceptable manner. A solution that did not imperil the credit lines of Jindal Saw was required, while still providing funding for the goods supplied in the shortest possible timeframe after being shipped from India.

    Finding the best solution

    Jindal Saw began discussions with its Iraqi client to find the best option to deliver assurance on payments once the goods were dispatched from India and one option, which both parties could mutually accept, was to supply material under a $168m Letter of Credit (L/C) issued by the Trade Bank of Iraq.

    Senior management still remained hesitant, however, and asked the treasury to go back to the table arguing for the need for an international bank that had the necessary capability, experience and expertise to be involved in the trade finance solution and to manage the transaction for the supplier.

    Jindal Saw officials approached Citi, Caylon Bank and other competing banks to propose a solution where either a bank of international stature, or their relationship bank, could provide confirmation on the L/C issued by the Trade Bank of Iraq. They were looking for a one-stop-shop solution covering L/C advisement right through to payment realisation, but, crucially, one that met all of the senior management team’s requirements to minimise the risks associated with the trade.

    Citi won the contract to supply the extra assurance that was desired. Its strategy was to design a unique structure where a 100 per cent cash margin was placed by Trade Bank of India with Citi in Dubai subsequent to the issuance of the L/C, thus covering Citi in Dubai of all risks under the $168m L/C issued by the Trade Bank of Iraq. Upon export, Jindal Saw would submit the documents under the L/C to Citi in India, which would jointly scrutinise the documents and immediately release the payment to Jindal Saw.

    Citi’s structure allowed Jindal Saw to receive “exports proceed” notification immediately upon document submission. On the back-end, Citi entered into an arrangement with the Trade Bank of Iraq on a 100 per cent cash deposit model, thereby covering a credit risk free confirmation, as well as earning revenues for itself in excess of $1m by acting as backer for the trade finance deal.

    Overcoming Obstacles

    The challenges of cross-border risk mitigation and realising secured payments as quickly as possible were the two primary challenges associated with financing this deal. The importer in Iraq would need credit and would not agree to an upfront payment, while the credit appetite of the original L/C issuing bank, the Trade Bank of Iraq which was facilitating the deal locally, also needed to be taken into consideration.

    An innovative one-off “double L/C” solution was developed to meet the various demands, including the supplier’s demand for risk assurance and quick payment after shipping.

    The deal was complex due to the limited capability of banks to add confirmation on the original L/C as a result of fears about political instability in Iraq. Citi in India discussed the challenges with the Citi team in Dubai and they in turn discussed the trade finance solution with the Trade Bank of Iraq, hammering out the final details.

    Citi was chosen to implement the strategic one-stop-shop solution whereby Citi in India could independently confirm the L/C issued by the Trade Bank of Iraq, even though the importer was located in a trade sensitive location. The $168m instrument was issued without actually placing any credit risk on the L/C issuing bank as Citi agreed to take this on as part of its $1m fee.

    The unique structure for the confirmation of the L/C was a true differentiator for both the client and the market, and it ensured a successful delivery and subsequent order for $150m this year.

    The key benefits of the bespoke L/C arrangement were:

    • significant risk reduction
    • quick payment
    • an expanded role for treasury within the corporate and the establishment of a template for future deals
    • compliance with all necessary regulatory, governmental and financial control requirements.

    Conclusions

    The trade finance solution developed by Citi for Jindal Saw addressed the concerns of both the treasury and the senior management at the firm to release the funds immediately after the shipment of goods and to minimise the risk. The eventual solution deployed offered the ability to remain with the existing L/C issuing bank, Trade Bank of Iraq, as preferred by the applicant, while still delivering the desired capability to cover the associated sovereign risks and the flexibility needed to approve the large value order internally at the manufacturer.

    The structure of the solution reduced the days sale outstanding (DSO) drastically and required no utilisation of credit lines, so working capital was not adversely affected. The structure was particularly innovative believe the participants: reissuing the L/C from Dubai to India to add the required confirmation and structuring on the back of the original L/C with a 100 per cent cash collateral margin kept by Trade Bank of Iraq, covered the credit risks involved with the instrument and enabled the deal to go ahead. It also provided a template for future deals and acted as a trade finance solution by facilitating a deal that may not have happened otherwise.

    All parties were satisfied with the solution and Iraq got some of the industrial and manufacturing equipment that it needs to rebuild. n

    This case study appeared originally on gtnews.com, and is based on an entry that won the Supply Chain/ Trade Finance category in some global corporate treasury and finance awards. Reprinted with permission.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
    Previous ArticleTrade: MENA needs a shake-up
    Next Article New aims for the future: ICIEC powers forward

    Related Posts

    Fostering growth; the evolution of trade finance in the Middle East

    November 9, 2018

    Looking on the Bright Side: Financing Solar in the GCC

    July 17, 2018

    Banking on digital expertise banking – corporate transaction the changing trend

    November 27, 2017
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Latest Posts

    CBQ: Building the Digital Backbone of Trade and Cash Management in Qatar – Interview

    February 2, 2026

    The Islamic Corporation for the Development of the Private Sector (ICD) Participates in Saudi Telecom Company’s USD 2.0 Billion Dual Tranche Sukuk Issuance

    January 20, 2026

    Network International partners with Saudi Sudanese Bank to accelerate digital transformation in Sudan’s banking sector

    January 20, 2026

    Doha Bank Introduces Qatar’s First Mobile App for Letter of Guarantee Initiation and Amendment

    November 26, 2025

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    © 2026 Cash and Trade Magazine. Designed by Top-Level.ws.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.