Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
    Cash And Trade MagazineCash And Trade Magazine
    Button
    • Cash
    • Trade
    • Islamic Finance
    • Interview
    • Issues
      • 2010
        • Issue 00 Launch Issue
        • Issue 01 January / February 2010
        • issue 02 March / April 2010
        • Issue 03 May / June 2010
        • Issue 04 July / August 2010
        • Issue 05 September / October 2010
        • Issue 06 November / December 2010
      • 2011
        • Issue 07 January / February 2011
        • Issue 08 March / April 2011
        • Issue 09 May / June 2011
        • Issue 10 July / August 2011
        • Issue 11 September / October 2011
        • Issue 12 November / December 2011
      • 2012
        • Issue 13 January / February 2012
        • Issue 14 March / April 2012
        • Issue 15 May / June 2012
        • Issue 16 July / August 2012
        • Issue 17 September / October 2012
        • Issue 18 November / December 2012
      • 2013
        • Issue 19 January / February 2013
        • Issue 20 March / April 2013
        • Issue 21 May / June 2013
        • Issue 22 July / August 2013
        • Issue 23 September / October 2013
        • Issue 24 November / December 2013
      • 2014
        • Issue 25 January / February 2014
        • Issue 26 March / April 2014
        • Issue 27 May / June 2014
        • Issue 28 July / August 2014
        • Issue 29 September / October 2014
        • Issue 30 November / December 2014
      • 2015
        • Issue 31 January / February 2015
        • Issue 32 March / April 2015
        • Issue 33 May / June 2015
        • Issue 34 July / August 2015
        • Issue 35 September / October 2015
    • News Round
    • Press Releases
    • Tajara Monitor
    • Training
    Cash And Trade MagazineCash And Trade Magazine
    Home»Press Releases»US versus China – Who matters more in Asia?
    Press Releases

    US versus China – Who matters more in Asia?

    August 13, 2013Updated:September 7, 20131 Comment2 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Telegram Pinterest Tumblr Reddit WhatsApp Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
    • Hong Kong, Taiwan, Singapore and Korea are more affected by China, rather than US, linkages
    • India, the Philippines, Indonesia, and Thailand are more exposed to the US
    • We examine the linkages via overall growth, and the trade, tourism and FDI channels

    Standard-Chartered-Bank-logoUS versus China – Who matters more?

    The news flow since May 2013 has hit growth expectations around the region through the double whammy of softer growth in China and signals of QE tapering in the US. For H2-2013, we see China’s growth staying broadly similar to that in H1-2013, while the US’ is likely to accelerate after the softest point of the year, which is likely to have been Q2-2013 (we expect Q2 US GDP growth to be 0.9% q/q SAAR). The swing in expectations of demand from the world’s two largest economies still matter significantly to the region most open to international trade. This is true even as we see more growth coming from domestic demand. The big question we ask regarding external linkages is, which matters more for which country?

    In this report, we examine how the relative importance of the US and China has evolved over time for the rest of Asia ex-Japan. We find that China is by no means the only story. For many countries, particularly for India and the Philippines, the relationship with US growth is more dominant (but note that this does not mean India’s growth is as exposed to the US as Hong Kong’s is to China). China has grown in importance relative to the US over the past few years, particularly for countries in Northeast Asia and Singapore. A reviving US might help to offset slower trend growth in China. We think China’s trend growth rate has come down to just over 7% and will not continue to deteriorate beyond this. Our 2014 US and China forecasts imply an overall impact (all else equal) of +1.1ppt for Malaysia, +0.8ppt for Taiwan and Hong Kong, +0.5ppt for Singapore, and +0.4ppt for Korea. On balance, our forecast of a moderate easing in China’s growth and a reasonable improvement in US growth is still positive for Asia.

    Click Here to Download the Report

     [download id=”31″]

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
    Previous ArticleDeutsche Bank launches Financial Supply Chain Manager on Autobahn App Market
    Next Article New Monthly Volume Record for DGCX Indian Rupee Futures in July

    Related Posts

    The Islamic Corporation for the Development of the Private Sector (ICD) Participates in Saudi Telecom Company’s USD 2.0 Billion Dual Tranche Sukuk Issuance

    January 20, 2026

    Network International partners with Saudi Sudanese Bank to accelerate digital transformation in Sudan’s banking sector

    January 20, 2026

    Doha Bank Introduces Qatar’s First Mobile App for Letter of Guarantee Initiation and Amendment

    November 26, 2025
    View 1 Comment

    1 Comment

    1. CashandTrade on August 13, 2013 10:33 am

      US versus China – Who matters more in Asia? http://t.co/s1SOVqWta0

      Log in to Reply
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Latest Posts

    CBQ: Building the Digital Backbone of Trade and Cash Management in Qatar – Interview

    February 2, 2026

    The Islamic Corporation for the Development of the Private Sector (ICD) Participates in Saudi Telecom Company’s USD 2.0 Billion Dual Tranche Sukuk Issuance

    January 20, 2026

    Network International partners with Saudi Sudanese Bank to accelerate digital transformation in Sudan’s banking sector

    January 20, 2026

    Doha Bank Introduces Qatar’s First Mobile App for Letter of Guarantee Initiation and Amendment

    November 26, 2025

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    © 2026 Cash and Trade Magazine. Designed by Top-Level.ws.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.