Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn
    Cash And Trade MagazineCash And Trade Magazine
    Button
    • Cash
    • Trade
    • Islamic Finance
    • Interview
    • Issues
      • 2010
        • Issue 00 Launch Issue
        • Issue 01 January / February 2010
        • issue 02 March / April 2010
        • Issue 03 May / June 2010
        • Issue 04 July / August 2010
        • Issue 05 September / October 2010
        • Issue 06 November / December 2010
      • 2011
        • Issue 07 January / February 2011
        • Issue 08 March / April 2011
        • Issue 09 May / June 2011
        • Issue 10 July / August 2011
        • Issue 11 September / October 2011
        • Issue 12 November / December 2011
      • 2012
        • Issue 13 January / February 2012
        • Issue 14 March / April 2012
        • Issue 15 May / June 2012
        • Issue 16 July / August 2012
        • Issue 17 September / October 2012
        • Issue 18 November / December 2012
      • 2013
        • Issue 19 January / February 2013
        • Issue 20 March / April 2013
        • Issue 21 May / June 2013
        • Issue 22 July / August 2013
        • Issue 23 September / October 2013
        • Issue 24 November / December 2013
      • 2014
        • Issue 25 January / February 2014
        • Issue 26 March / April 2014
        • Issue 27 May / June 2014
        • Issue 28 July / August 2014
        • Issue 29 September / October 2014
        • Issue 30 November / December 2014
      • 2015
        • Issue 31 January / February 2015
        • Issue 32 March / April 2015
        • Issue 33 May / June 2015
        • Issue 34 July / August 2015
        • Issue 35 September / October 2015
    • News Round
    • Press Releases
    • Tajara Monitor
    • Training
    Cash And Trade MagazineCash And Trade Magazine
    Home»Issues»2012»Issue 17 September / October 2012»Letter from the editorial director
    Issue 17 September / October 2012

    Letter from the editorial director

    September 4, 2012Updated:February 12, 2013No Comments4 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Telegram Pinterest Tumblr Reddit WhatsApp Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
    Hani Al Maskati, Editorial Director & Publisher

    Dear Reader,

    If there’s anything guaranteed to arouse interest in the banking and corporate space it’s a secure payment system that eschews documentation.

    That is why MENA is now looking favourably at SWIFT’s Bank Payment Obligation (BPO). The BPO is an electronic instrument that can be transmitted between two banks in a trade finance transaction to provide an irrevocable undertaking that one will pay the other on a specified date – after the successful electronic matching of data.

    So far, SWIFT’s BPO has attracted significant interest in Asia, and now a positive picture is also emerging in the Middle East, where it is poised to provide a viable alternative to both open account trade and letters of credit.

    “I believe that this has a lot to do with the sophistication of corporate customers and also the corporate culture in the Middle East,” said one banker interviewed in our article in this issue.  “There is a greater readiness to accept new things within this region.”

    It’s felt that the BPO will appeal most to Middle Eastern buyers and suppliers who are regular trading partners and have long-term, strategic relationships.

    Already, early bank joiners of the BPO initiative, such as the Qatar National Bank Group, have witnessed interest and enthusiasm from their corporate customers during initial discussions about the SWIFT system.

    “Customers are always interested in any potential process or efficiency enhancements offered by the banks. We have introduced this concept to a few of our customers to seek initial feedback, and the response was always positive,” said another banker.

    However, he added, “We foresee that the adoption of the electronic-data-matching-concept – instead of physical documents checking – will take a certain amount of time as IT systems and business and operational processes need to be changed, not only on the bank side- but also on the customer side as well.”

    Islamic finance is one of the world’s fastest-growing asset classes. But a number of barriers are currently preventing the sector reaching its full potential – particularly the lack of a uniform set of rules and regulations for Sharia compliance, says Carsten Kayatz, of Commerzbank, author of our “guest article” in this edition..

    The most recent economic forecasts continue to point towards sustained, rapid growth for Islamic finance – industry estimates suggest this expansion could total up to $5 trillion in Sharia-compliant assets by 2016.

    This expansion brings with it opportunities for Islamic and non-Islamic corporates and financial institutions alike. But, in their efforts to gain access to the necessary capital and liquidity to meet the growing demand of their clients, Islamic banks need to be able to access funding (from banks and the global capital markets) in a manner that is compliant with Islamic law.

    To date, though, there has been a clear lack of Sharia-compliant instruments meeting today’s needs to manage short-term liquidity. The reason for this is that Islamic finance has yet to become fully established alongside conventional global banking instruments. In order to become more widely utilised internationally there are a number of challenges the sector needs to overcome – particularly in adopting a more standardised financial infrastructure.

    Several banks engaged in the crucial sector of trade finance were rewarded for their continued efforts and innovations, by showing double-digit increases on the previous year. The sector’s contribution is even more impressive, as illustrated in the latest UAE Tajara Monitor published by Cash Management Matters (CMM), when set against an overall decrease, of some five per cent year-on-year, in total bank fees and commissions.

    Trade finance income has risen in the UAE thanks to a resurgence of  both exports and imports. With a majority of reporting banks posting figures far in excess of AED 100 million, trade fees and commissions rose by an average of seven per cent in 2011 in the Emirates.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
    Previous ArticleMisys ties up with IDB Group
    Next Article Coface Emirates Services brings Trade Credit Insurance to Emirati and Gulf based SMEs

    Related Posts

    Misys ties up with IDB Group

    September 4, 2012

    Gulf banks to beat eurozone turmoil

    September 4, 2012

    UAE GDP set to pick up

    September 4, 2012
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Latest Posts

    CBQ: Building the Digital Backbone of Trade and Cash Management in Qatar – Interview

    February 2, 2026

    The Islamic Corporation for the Development of the Private Sector (ICD) Participates in Saudi Telecom Company’s USD 2.0 Billion Dual Tranche Sukuk Issuance

    January 20, 2026

    Network International partners with Saudi Sudanese Bank to accelerate digital transformation in Sudan’s banking sector

    January 20, 2026

    Doha Bank Introduces Qatar’s First Mobile App for Letter of Guarantee Initiation and Amendment

    November 26, 2025

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    © 2026 Cash and Trade Magazine. Designed by Top-Level.ws.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.